<!--begin-bvseo-reviews--> <!--begin-reviews--> <div id="bvseo-reviewsSection"> <div class="bvseo-review" itemprop="review" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Review" data-reviewid="1192691962"> <span itemprop="reviewRating" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Rating"> Rated <span itemprop="ratingValue">1</span> out of <span itemprop="bestRating">5</span> </span> by <span itemprop="author" itemtype="https://schema.org/Person" itemscope><span itemprop="name">El Hidrocalido</span></span> from <span itemprop="name">Disappointing</span> <span itemprop="description">What in the world was the Lego team thinking with The Thing?!! He looks horrible. I would rather pay a little more to get the actual big figure of him. In the end, he looks weird and it is a bad design. Those hands don't do him justice. They reuse the faces on these minifigs and I can understand that. Lego can't really go into detail with faces. However, it is a fair set with Galactus being the main build. Everything is overpriced now. I just really hope Lego bring more Fantastic Four sets like in the comics and with The Thing as a big fig.</span> <div class="bvseo-pubdate">Date published: 2025-06-03</div> <meta itemprop="datePublished" content="2025-06-03" /> </div> <div class="bvseo-review" itemprop="review" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Review" data-reviewid="1192620948"> <span itemprop="reviewRating" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Rating"> Rated <span itemprop="ratingValue">5</span> out of <span itemprop="bestRating">5</span> </span> by <span itemprop="author" itemtype="https://schema.org/Person" itemscope><span itemprop="name">RoboticEagle082</span></span> from <span itemprop="name">OUTSTANDING!</span> <span itemprop="description">I've never been a fan of building Lego figures, however, this came out much better than I expected. I actually bought this for the mini-figures, however, I really like the Galactus figure. I is easy to build, looks much better than the photos and is really very sturdy. It stands up quite well which makes it easy to display. I couldn't be happier.</span> <div class="bvseo-pubdate">Date published: 2025-06-01</div> <meta itemprop="datePublished" content="2025-06-01" /> </div> <div class="bvseo-review" itemprop="review" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Review" data-reviewid="1192606468"> <span itemprop="reviewRating" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Rating"> Rated <span itemprop="ratingValue">4</span> out of <span itemprop="bestRating">5</span> </span> by <span itemprop="author" itemtype="https://schema.org/Person" itemscope><span itemprop="name">FlatulentTwig056</span></span> from <span itemprop="name">It's About Time!</span> <span itemprop="description">It only took 12 years, but we finally have a Fantastic Four Lego set, and while the build is incredible, the minifigures are kind of lacking in some areas. First, Galactus is easily the best construction figure Lego has ever made, mostly because he makes sense, and while it would have been nice for him to have the same anatomy as a minifigure, you can kind of excuse it because he is not human. Now we get to the minifigures, for the most part they aren't bad, even the reused heads for Sue and Johnny work for those characters. But the lack of boots for the team is perplexing, especially when Reed's leg extensions have boots while the rest of the team doesn't. But that's not the worst thing in this set (no pun intended). What were you thinking when it came to Ben?! I get the Thing is as tall as the Hulk, but a bigfig or something in between would have represented his bulk better than a regular minifigure ever could. That's the most disappointing aspect of the set for me, you made the most iconic member of the Fantastic Four look terrible. And while that seems minuscule in the grand scheme of things, it bogs down what is otherwise a really good set. I hope in the near future we get more Fantastic Four sets (preferably comic based ones), hopefully with an improved, bulkier Thing.</span> <div class="bvseo-pubdate">Date published: 2025-06-01</div> <meta itemprop="datePublished" content="2025-06-01" /> </div> </div> <script type="text/javascript"> if (document.getElementById('bvseo-reviewsSection')) { document.getElementById('bvseo-reviewsSection').style.display = 'none'; } </script> <!--end-reviews--> <ul id="BVSEO_meta" style="display:none!important"> <li data-bvseo="bvDateModified">y_2025, m_6, d_7, h_8</li> <li data-bvseo="ps">bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.42</li> <li data-bvseo="cp">cp_1, bvpage1</li> <li data-bvseo="co">co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_3</li> <li data-bvseo="cf">loc_en_CA, sid_6424A859, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]</li> <li data-bvseo="diagnostics">clientName_toysrus-ca</li> </ul> <!--end-bvseo-reviews--> <ul id="BVSEOSDK_meta" style="display: none !important;"> <li data-bvseo="sdk">bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 18.2.0, p_sdk_3.2.0</li> <li data-bvseo="sp_mt">CLOUD, getReviews, 6ms</li> <li data-bvseo="ct_st">reviews, product</li> </ul>

<ul id="BVSEOSDK_meta" style="display: none !important;"> <li data-bvseo="sdk">bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 18.2.0, p_sdk_3.2.0</li> <li data-bvseo="sp_mt">CLOUD, getContent, 21ms</li> <li data-bvseo="ct_st">questions, product</li> <li data-bvseo="ms">bvseo-msg: Unsuccessful GET. status = 'ERROR', msg = 'Not Found.';</li> </ul>